[ad_1]
Gurugram, Chintels India stuck in Central Building Research Institute ,CBRI) for a second structural audit of his Paradiso society in Sector 109, where vertical cave-in of five flats at 18-storey Tower D had resulted in the death of two residents on February 10 last year.
The developer has also urged the Deputy Commissioner to keep in abeyance the order for the demolition of the tower “till then”. In November last year, DC Nishant Yadav ordered the leveling of the highrise building based on the recommendation of IIT-Delhi. The CBI is currently probing the collapse of the flats.
A spokesperson for Chintels said CBRI-Roorkee will audit all the nine towers of the society spread over 12 acres and recover Rs 60 lakh as fee. This audit will include structural analysis of structures and chemical analysis of samples. The audit will be completed in six months while the interim report is expected in four months.
Earlier IIT-Delhi, which assessed the building, pointed out structural deficiencies in the tower and termed it “unsafe for habitation”. Based on the report, the Deputy Commissioner had ordered the “demolition of the tower” on November 9 last year after settling the claims of the affected residents within 60 days.
“Since we have still not been provided with the actual laboratory test results of the audit conducted by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) through IIT-Delhi, we have decided to seek a second opinion by involving CBRI, a more professional and government agency Have done,” said a Chintels spokesperson.
“We have already signed the contract and submitted the fee for the structural audit. We have also urged the authorities to wait for the report of the institute and keep the demolition order in abeyance till then.
The scope of work of CBRI will include detailed visual inspection of the site, structural system design review and structural analysis, geotechnical investigation reports on foundation design, stability checks and quality control tests. It will make further recommendations for strengthening including material specification for the building.
It may be mentioned here that after the demolition was ordered, the Chintels wrote to the DC that “it would not be prudent to go and destroy a beautiful building.” residential project, on the basis of a baseless report from any organization, without exploring any other possible options”.
DC Nishant Yadav told TOI, “The developer can opt for a second audit but he will have to follow the orders of the district administration.”
[ad_2]
Source link